X-Git-Url: http://shamusworld.gotdns.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcircle.cpp;h=77ea95a6290e5ca87dbe8ba9477bac561fce7bef;hb=89b8b0c60579d8ef0cf9a13521e7bf7c7864883f;hp=0780f6258bc32f67a94e3d097a5a797f3d6094c1;hpb=e11a07565fe5ef3dfafbf9a933d7a1575e058867;p=architektonas

diff --git a/src/circle.cpp b/src/circle.cpp
index 0780f62..77ea95a 100644
--- a/src/circle.cpp
+++ b/src/circle.cpp
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 Circle::Circle(Vector p1, double r, Object * p/*= NULL*/): Object(p1, p), radius(r),
 	draggingEdge(false), draggingCenter(false), hitCenter(false), hitCircle(false)
 {
+	type = OTCircle;
 }
 
 
@@ -86,6 +87,17 @@ Circle::~Circle()
 
 /*virtual*/ void Circle::PointerMoved(Vector point)
 {
+	if (selectionInProgress)
+	{
+		// Check for whether or not the rect contains this circle
+		if (selection.normalized().contains(Extents()))
+			state = OSSelected;
+		else
+			state = OSInactive;
+
+		return;
+	}
+
 	// Hit test tells us what we hit (if anything) through boolean variables. It
 	// also tells us whether or not the state changed.
 	needUpdate = HitTest(point);
@@ -114,7 +126,7 @@ Circle::~Circle()
 }
 
 
-bool Circle::HitTest(Point point)
+/*virtual*/ bool Circle::HitTest(Point point)
 {
 	SaveState();
 	hitCenter = hitCircle = false;
@@ -147,6 +159,12 @@ pointed at length with our on screen length.
 }
 
 
+/*virtual*/ QRectF Circle::Extents(void)
+{
+	return QRectF(QPointF(position.x - radius, position.y - radius), QPointF(position.x + radius, position.y + radius));
+}
+
+
 void Circle::SaveState(void)
 {
 	oldHitCenter = hitCenter;
@@ -168,3 +186,19 @@ bool Circle::StateChanged(void)
 	fprintf(file, "CIRCLE (%lf,%lf) %lf\n", position.x, position.y, radius);
 }
 
+
+/*virtual*/ Object * Circle::Copy(void)
+{
+#warning "!!! This doesn't take care of attached Dimensions !!!"
+/*
+This is a real problem. While having a pointer in the Dimension to this line's points
+is fast & easy, it creates a huge problem when trying to replicate an object like this.
+
+Maybe a way to fix that then, is to have reference numbers instead of pointers. That
+way, if you copy them, ... you might still have problems. Because you can't be sure if
+a copy will be persistant or not, you then *definitely* do not want them to have the
+same reference number.
+*/
+	return new Circle(position, radius, parent);
+}
+