Minimal commit for Paul.

[ardour-manual-diverged] / _manual / 16_recording / 01_monitoring / 02_monitor-signal-flow.html

diff --git a/_manual/16_recording/01_monitoring/02_monitor-signal-flow.html b/_manual/16_recording/01_monitoring/02_monitor-signal-flow.html
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 20a9f9a..0000000
--- a/_manual/16_recording/01_monitoring/02_monitor-signal-flow.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
----
-layout: default
-title: Monitor Signal Flow
-menu_title: Signal Flow
----                        
-
-<p>There are three basic ways to approach monitoring: </p>
-
-<h3>External Monitoring</h3> 
-<img class="right"
-src="/diagrams/external-monitoring.png" />
-<p>When using <dfn>external monitoring</dfn>, Ardour plays no role in
-  monitoring at all. Perhaps the recording set-up has an external mixer which
-  can be used to set up monitor mixes, or perhaps the sound-card being used
-  has a "listen to the input" feature. This approach yields zero or near-zero 
-  latency.  On the other hand it requires external hardware, and the monitoring 
-  settings are less flexible and not saved with the session.</p> 
-
-<h3>JACK-Based Hardware Monitoring</h3> 
-<img class="right" src="/diagrams/jack-monitoring.png" />
-<p>Some sound cards have the ability
-  to mix signals from their inputs to their outputs with very low or even zero 
-  latency, a feature called <dfn>hardware monitoring</dfn>.
-  Furthermore, on some cards this function can be controlled by JACK.  This is a nice arrangement,
-  if the sound card supports it, as it combines the convenience of having the
-  monitoring controlled by Ardour with the low latency operation of doing it
-  externally.
-</p> 
-
-<h3>Software Monitoring</h3> 
-<img class="right" src="/diagrams/ardour-monitoring.png" />
-<p>With the <dfn>software monitoring</dfn> approach, all monitoring is
-  performed by Ardour &mdash; it makes track inputs available at track
-  outputs, governed by various controls. This approach will almost always have
-  more routing flexibility than JACK-based monitoring. The disadvantage is
-  that there will be some latency between the input and the output, which
-  depends for the most part on the JACK buffer size that is being used. 
-</p> 
-
-{% children %}