Removed link to MIDI on Linux page in Mackie Control setup page.

[ardour-manual] / include / monitor-signal-flow.html

diff --git a/include/monitor-signal-flow.html b/include/monitor-signal-flow.html
index 84b4eef8269c678e1d3cb1968fca3c3442495f7c..5560d4b33619bef77175e39d12014344c21c9242 100644 (file)
--- a/include/monitor-signal-flow.html
+++ b/include/monitor-signal-flow.html
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
   latency.  On the other hand it requires external hardware, and the monitoring
   settings are less flexible and not saved with the session.</p>
 
   latency.  On the other hand it requires external hardware, and the monitoring
   settings are less flexible and not saved with the session.</p>
 

-<h3 class="clear">JACK-Based Hardware Monitoring</h3>
+<h3 class="clear">Audio driver Hardware Monitoring</h3>

 
 <figure class="right">
     <img src="/images/jack-monitoring.png" alt="Hardware Monitoring">
 
 <figure class="right">
     <img src="/images/jack-monitoring.png" alt="Hardware Monitoring">


@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 <p>Some sound cards have the ability
   to mix signals from their inputs to their outputs with very low or even zero
   latency, a feature called <dfn>hardware monitoring</dfn>.
 <p>Some sound cards have the ability
   to mix signals from their inputs to their outputs with very low or even zero
   latency, a feature called <dfn>hardware monitoring</dfn>.

-  Furthermore, on some cards this function can be controlled by JACK. This is a nice arrangement,
+  Furthermore, on some cards this function can be controlled by Ardour. This is a nice arrangement,

   if the sound card supports it, as it combines the convenience of having the
   monitoring controlled by Ardour with the low latency operation of doing it
   externally.
   if the sound card supports it, as it combines the convenience of having the
   monitoring controlled by Ardour with the low latency operation of doing it
   externally.


@@ -49,6 +49,6 @@
   outputs, governed by various controls. This approach will almost always have
   more routing flexibility than JACK-based monitoring. The disadvantage is
   that there will be some latency between the input and the output, which
   outputs, governed by various controls. This approach will almost always have
   more routing flexibility than JACK-based monitoring. The disadvantage is
   that there will be some latency between the input and the output, which

-  depends for the most part on the JACK buffer size that is being used.
+  depends for the most part on the buffer size that is being used.

 </p>
 
 </p>